Types of Autism: From Diagnostic Labels to a Holistic Spectrum
- Cody Thomas Rounds
- 3 days ago
- 5 min read
Key Points
types of autism and diagnostic evolution
Asperger’s, PDD-NOS, and NVLD explained
high- vs low-functioning autism limitations
DSM-5 reclassification into spectrum
autism and holistic neurodivergence
Introduction: Why “Types of Autism” Still Matters
For decades, families, clinicians, and individuals have tried to answer one persistent question: what are the types of autism? The labels used have shifted across time—Asperger’s, PDD-NOS, high-functioning, low-functioning, NVLD. Today, in the DSM-5, these subtypes no longer officially exist; they have been folded into a single diagnosis: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
But the older labels continue to circulate because they captured something real—differences in experience, presentation, and support needs. Understanding both the history and the holistic meaning of “types of autism” helps us grasp not only the evolution of psychology but also the broader concept of neurodivergence.
Early Views of Autism
Autism was first described in the 1940s, almost simultaneously by Leo Kanner in the United States and Hans Asperger in Austria.
Kanner’s autism described children with profound social withdrawal, language difficulties, and restricted interests.
Asperger’s autism described children with average or above-average intelligence but marked difficulties in social reciprocity and rigidity.
These parallel descriptions planted the seeds for later distinctions between “classic autism” and “Asperger’s syndrome.”
Through the latter half of the 20th century, autism was often narrowly defined, associated with severe disability and institutional care. As research expanded, clinicians realized that many individuals showed autistic traits without fitting the narrow definition. This led to the creation of broader diagnostic categories.
Asperger’s Syndrome
Perhaps the most well-known of the older categories, Asperger’s syndrome was recognized in the DSM-IV (1994). It applied to individuals with:
Average or above-average intelligence.
No significant language delay.
Difficulty with social reciprocity and communication.
Intense, restricted interests or repetitive behaviors.
The diagnosis offered many people an explanation for lifelong struggles, particularly adults. It became culturally significant, associated with “high-functioning” autism and sometimes romanticized in portrayals of eccentric geniuses.
Yet the Asperger’s label was also limiting. Many who did not meet the exact criteria but still needed support were excluded, and the “high-functioning” designation often obscured real challenges with daily life.
PDD-NOS (Pervasive Developmental Disorder–Not Otherwise Specified)
PDD-NOS became the “catch-all” category for those who showed some autistic traits but did not meet criteria for classic autism or Asperger’s. It was especially common for children who had developmental delays but atypical presentations.
While PDD-NOS provided access to services, it also created confusion. The label lacked clarity, leaving families uncertain about prognosis or support needs. It underscored the difficulty of drawing firm lines between types of autism when the reality was much more fluid.
NVLD (Nonverbal Learning Disorder)
Although never formally classified as a type of autism in DSM manuals, nonverbal learning disorder (NVLD) has often been discussed alongside autism. NVLD describes a profile of strengths in verbal reasoning but difficulties with spatial, social, and nonverbal communication skills.
Some researchers view NVLD as overlapping with autism spectrum disorder, while others see it as distinct. Many children and adults with NVLD share struggles similar to those with autism, such as interpreting social cues or adapting to new environments. Its uncertain status highlights how blurry the borders of “types of autism” can be.
High-Functioning vs. Low-Functioning Labels
In everyday language, many people distinguished between “high-functioning autism” and “low-functioning autism.”
High-functioning typically meant individuals with strong verbal skills and independence in daily life.
Low-functioning referred to individuals with significant intellectual or language impairments.
While these terms were widely used, they oversimplified reality. Functioning labels often ignored the uneven profile of abilities in autism: a person may excel in one domain while struggling profoundly in another. They also created stigma, with “low-functioning” implying incapacity and “high-functioning” minimizing support needs.
The DSM-5 Reclassification
In 2013, the DSM-5 collapsed Asperger’s, PDD-NOS, and autistic disorder into a single diagnosis: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The rationale was clear: research showed these categories lacked consistent boundaries. Many individuals moved between labels depending on which clinician made the assessment or which criteria were emphasized.
ASD is now defined by two core domains:
Persistent deficits in social communication and interaction.
Restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities.
Severity levels are specified based on support needs rather than subtypes. This reflects a more dimensional understanding of autism as a spectrum rather than distinct categories.
Why the Old Labels Persist
Despite the DSM change, the older types of autism remain in cultural and clinical conversation. Adults previously diagnosed with Asperger’s still identify with the term. Parents still describe children as “high-functioning” or “low-functioning.” Researchers continue to study profiles like NVLD.
These terms persist because they capture meaningful differences in lived experience. While the unified spectrum diagnosis is scientifically more consistent, people need language to describe variation. The persistence of these labels reflects a gap between clinical precision and everyday understanding.
Autism as Neurodivergence
To think holistically about the types of autism, it is helpful to place them within the broader category of neurodivergence. Neurodivergence includes ADHD, dyslexia, dyspraxia, Tourette’s, and other developmental differences. What unites them is not a deficit but a divergence from the “neurotypical” style of thinking and processing.
Autism, in its many types and profiles, is central to this movement. Rather than fragmenting into rigid categories, a holistic view emphasizes:
Individual variation – Each autistic person presents differently; one-size labels cannot capture the whole.
Strengths and challenges – Autism includes difficulties with social reciprocity but also strengths in focus, pattern recognition, or creativity.
Contextual needs – Support requirements vary depending on environment, not just diagnostic label.
From this perspective, “types of autism” are less about fixed categories and more about acknowledging diversity within diversity.
The Broader Cultural Meaning
The shift from subtypes to spectrum reflects a cultural transition. Earlier labels reflected an attempt to classify difference neatly. Today, the recognition is that autism resists neat classification. Like personality, it exists on a continuum.
This cultural shift has consequences. It changes how services are allocated, how individuals self-identify, and how society views neurodivergence. Moving beyond rigid types allows for more individualized support but risks losing the shorthand language people still find meaningful.
Closing Movement: Beyond Types to Understanding
The history of autism classification shows both the need for categories and their limitations. Asperger’s, PDD-NOS, NVLD, high- and low-functioning—all were attempts to describe difference. The DSM-5 unified them into a single spectrum, acknowledging that autism cannot be sliced cleanly into subtypes.
Yet the search for types of autism continues because lived experience varies. Some individuals relate more to the Asperger’s profile; others identify with NVLD-like traits. The challenge is to hold both truths: that autism is one spectrum, and that within it exist many ways of being.
To ask about the types of autism, then, is not to seek rigid boxes but to seek understanding. It is to recognize that difference is not disorder alone, but variation within the human mind. From Kanner’s early descriptions to today’s spectrum model, the story of autism is the story of how psychology learns to see diversity not as fragmentation but as complexity.
The information in this blog is for educational and entertainment purposes only
Additional Resources
In a world where personal exploration and self-understanding are pivotal, embarking on a journey through collaborative assessment stands as a deeply enriching endeavor. As your experienced guide in this transformative process, I am dedicated to facilitating a deeper dive into your personal narrative, helping unveil the intricate layers of your individuality and fostering a pathway to authentic self-discovery and growth.
Individual Therapy: Personalized Psychological Support If you're seeking transformative psychological support, my specialized service is here for you. I cater to a diverse range of clients - from those grappling with emotional challenges, students navigating the pressures of college life, to high-achieving professionals seeking balance. My approach is tailored to your unique needs, fostering wellness, equilibrium, and a profound understanding of your inner self.
Couples Therapy: Strengthening Relationships Together For couples, therapy is a brave journey towards a more harmonious and fulfilling union. Embark on this transformative process with your partner, where you'll explore the complexities of your relationship together. Address underlying issues, strengthen your bond, and grow closer than ever before in a collaborative and supportive environment.
