top of page

PsychAtWork Magazine

Insight That Moves You Forward 

The content of this site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.  Terms of Use

Beyond ABAS-3: Adding Coping Metrics to Traditional Adaptive-Skill Profiles

  • Writer: Cody Thomas Rounds
    Cody Thomas Rounds
  • May 31
  • 3 min read

5 Key Points:

  1. Traditional adaptive-skill profiles like ABAS-3 and Vineland emphasize abilities and independence but often overlook coping and emotional regulation.

  2. CIISA’s Coping domain addresses this gap by assessing how individuals manage stress, frustration, and unexpected challenges.

  3. Including coping metrics provides a more holistic view of functional strengths and areas for support.

  4. Understanding coping capacity helps tailor interventions that build resilience, improve engagement, and reduce behavioral disruptions.

  5. Collaboration among school psychologists, ABA/OT clinicians, and educators ensures adaptive and coping data inform meaningful support plans.


Illustration of a pensive person in profile on vibrant orange background. Black ink lines create detailed hair and facial features. Mood: contemplative.

The Limits of Traditional Adaptive-Skill Assessments

Adding Coping Metrics to Traditional Adaptive-Skill Profiles. Adaptive behavior assessments like ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Third Edition) and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales have long served as core tools in evaluating how individuals function in everyday environments. These assessments provide structured insights into critical domains such as communication, daily living skills, and socialization. The results are often used to guide educational programming, therapeutic interventions, and decisions about supports. However, these tools have a significant limitation: they do not capture how individuals manage frustration, stress, or unexpected challenges—factors that can dramatically influence day-to-day functioning and success.

Bridging the Gap: CIISA’s Coping Domain

The CIISA (Comprehensive Independence and Interpersonal Skills Assessment) introduces a Coping domain designed to bridge this gap. By evaluating how well individuals manage adversity, frustration, and unexpected changes, it provides a more holistic and actionable profile that can guide support planning. This domain looks at behaviors such as self-soothing, requesting help, problem-solving, and flexibility, while also identifying when coping efforts break down into avoidance, aggression, or shutdown.

Why Adaptive Measures Alone Are Insufficient

Traditional assessments focus on observable skills such as self-care, communication, and socialization. An individual may demonstrate high levels of independence in controlled or structured environments, yet struggle when confronted with frustration, novelty, or ambiguity. For example, someone might independently manage hygiene routines and communicate effectively in predictable contexts but become overwhelmed during unstructured group activities or transitions, leading to withdrawal, resistance, or dysregulation. These reactions are not adequately captured by ABAS-3 or Vineland scores.

Practical Benefits of Adding Coping Metrics

Integrating coping assessments into adaptive profiles offers multiple benefits:

  • Tailored Interventions: Identify individuals who need targeted support in emotional regulation or resilience-building, even if their adaptive skills seem strong.

  • Improved Engagement: Coping capacity directly affects the ability to persist in tasks, participate in group activities, and navigate environmental demands.

  • Reduced Disruptions: Understanding triggers and coping styles allows for proactive strategies to minimize behavioral incidents and promote smoother transitions.

Including coping metrics highlights discrepancies between surface-level functional skills and underlying emotional regulation capacities. It enables the creation of nuanced and effective intervention plans that address both skill-building and underlying barriers to success.

Collaborative Application Across Disciplines

CIISA’s design facilitates collaboration between disciplines. School psychologists, ABA practitioners, and occupational therapists each bring unique perspectives and strategies to support individuals. By combining adaptive and coping data, these professionals can coordinate interventions that address both skill acquisition and emotional regulation. This integrated approach helps create a consistent and supportive environment across settings.

For instance, a psychologist might use CIISA data to recommend social-emotional learning interventions targeting frustration tolerance, while an occupational therapist develops sensory-based strategies to manage environmental stressors. An ABA practitioner could reinforce coping skills during sessions, using visual schedules, timers, or reinforcement systems to build frustration tolerance and task persistence.

Progress Monitoring and Ethical Considerations

CIISA’s framework encourages regular reassessment of both adaptive skills and coping capacities, ensuring that support plans remain responsive to evolving needs. Data collected over time can reveal patterns of improvement, plateau, or regression, allowing teams to adjust strategies proactively.

Ethical considerations are essential when expanding assessment to include coping metrics. Collecting and integrating detailed behavioral and emotional data requires safeguarding privacy, ensuring data integrity, and involving individuals and their families in discussions about assessment results and intervention planning. Transparency and collaboration build trust and support effective implementation of recommendations.

A Holistic Approach to Adding Coping Metrics to Traditional Adaptive-Skill Profiles

Incorporating coping metrics into adaptive-skill profiles offers a more complete and actionable understanding of individual needs. It allows educational and therapeutic teams to move beyond a limited view of functional abilities and embrace a holistic approach that accounts for the complexities of real-world challenges. By addressing both skill proficiency and coping capacity, teams can design interventions that not only build independence but also foster resilience, emotional regulation, and long-term success.


Additional Resources

Empowerment Through Personalized Insight

Whether you’re an educator, therapist, or family member supporting a loved one—or an individual seeking a deeper understanding of your personal capabilities—the Comprehensive Independence and Interpersonal Skills Assessment (CIISA) offers an empowering pathway. By illuminating strengths, clarifying challenges, and guiding growth, this process cultivates greater independence, resilience, and authentic connections.


Contact today for a consultation:

Take the first step. Let's embark on this transformative journey together, paving the way for success, fulfillment, and growth.




Headshot image of Cody Thomas Rounds

Editor in Chief

Cody Thomas Rounds is a licensed clinical psychologist- Master, Vice President of the Vermont Psychological Association (VPA), and an expert in leadership development, identity formation, and psychological assessment. As the chair and founder of the VPA’s Grassroots Advocacy Committee, Cody has spearheaded efforts to amplify diverse voices and ensure inclusive representation in mental health advocacy initiatives across Vermont.

In his national role as Federal Advocacy Coordinator for the American Psychological Association (APA), Cody works closely with Congressional delegates in Washington, D.C., championing mental health policy and advancing legislative initiatives that strengthen access to care and promote resilience on a systemic level.

Cody’s professional reach extends beyond advocacy into psychotherapy and career consulting. As the founder of BTR Psychotherapy, he specializes in helping individuals and organizations navigate challenges, build resilience, and develop leadership potential. His work focuses on empowering people to thrive by fostering adaptability, emotional intelligence, and personal growth.

In addition to his clinical and consulting work, Cody serves as Editor-in-Chief of PsycheAtWork Magazine and Learn Do Grow Publishing. Through these platforms, he combines psychological insights with interactive learning tools, creating engaging resources for professionals and the general public alike.

With a multidisciplinary background that includes advanced degrees in Clinical Psychology, guest lecturing, and interdisciplinary collaboration, Cody brings a rich perspective to his work. Whether advocating for systemic change, mentoring future leaders, or developing educational resources, Cody’s mission is to inspire growth, foster professional excellence, and drive meaningful progress in both clinical and corporate spaces.

Disclaimer

The content provided on this blog is for informational and educational purposes only. While I am a licensed clinical psychologist, the information shared here does not constitute professional psychological, medical, legal, or career advice. Reading this blog does not establish a professional or therapeutic relationship between the reader and the author.

The insights, strategies, and discussions on personal wellness and professional development are general in nature and may not apply to every individual’s unique circumstances. Readers are encouraged to consult with a qualified professional before making any decisions related to mental health, career transitions, or personal growth.

Additionally, while I strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, I make no warranties or guarantees regarding the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of the content. Any actions taken based on this blog’s content are at the reader’s own discretion and risk.

If you are experiencing a mental health crisis or require immediate support, please seek assistance from a licensed professional or crisis service in your area.

By using this blog, you acknowledge and agree to this disclaimer.

Additional Terms of Use

Copyright Concerns Contact Information

If you believe that any content on CodyThomasRounds.com or PsycheAtWork.com infringes upon your copyright, please contact us with the following information:

  • Your name and contact information (email and/or phone number)

  • A description of the copyrighted work you believe has been infringed

  • The specific URL or location of the alleged infringing content

  • A statement confirming that you believe the use of the material is unauthorized

  • A declaration that the information provided is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on their behalf

Please send all copyright concerns to:

📩 CONTACT

We take copyright matters seriously and will review and address concerns promptly.

bottom of page